You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Pakistan’ tag.
I suspect we’ve been preoccupied lately, with the Presidential Campaign Season, Hurricanes, Sarah Barracuda, Financial Disaster…you get the picture. But there is a disturbance in the Middle East, and we might be making a new enemy. I’ve heard a news byte on the radio here and there, and read the occasional article elsewhere, and until recently, I didn’t realize that we have some possible development in Pakistan. Since July, the US has been moving forward with Afghan/Pakistan border raids–despite Pakistan’s protests–in a region considered a likely hiding place for al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
I remember hearing a while back that we had chased some militants into the border area of Pakistan nearest to Afghanistan. There wasn’t a lot of media hype (exactly which media outlet makes the decision about “what is news” anyway?), so it passed out of my memory. Now it seems like the intermittent “border crossings” are becoming more frequent. Americans had been keeping up with the War on Terror, but news about Iraq, Afghanistan and the surrounding nations have been pushed into the background somewhat, while we weren’t looking.
Pakistan’s Foreign Minister had some choice words about the US strategy (tactic…whatever), The U.N. workers and British diplomats in Pakistan have sent their children out of the country–because each strike has had some accompanying civilian casualties and Al Quaeda is retaliating. Last month, the Marriott hotel in Islamabad endured a suicide bomber attack that used a truck filled with explosives, killing 60 people and injuring more than 260 others.
President Asif Ali Zardari has described the bombing as an assassination attempt he and other top national leaders narrowly escaped.
Part of the problem is that Pakistan hasn’t cut ties to militant groups; the other half is that the Bush Administration is running these raids without Pakistan’s consent or approval. While the U.S. military operations have been successfully targeting key extremists, the civilian deaths alongside have not exactly helped win the “hearts and minds” of a country long allied with us in the War on Terror. Lisa Curtis, of the Heritage Foundation, said that not only is this fueling extremist behavior, it is also undermining the Pakistani government’s denunciation of militant acts. The US may need to continue to rely on unilateral military action in the Tribal Areas to protect its troops fighting across the border in Afghanistan in order to prevent a future, potentially catastrophic international terrorist attack.
US officials in Afghanistan or Washington rarely acknowledge the attacks, but Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, said:
It hurts us even more when the transgressor is our friend and ally, the US.
Qureshi has also warned that US military operations in Pakistani territory undermine efforts to fight terrorism and serve to “fan” extremism. American officials complain that Pakistan is unwilling or unable to act against the militants.
I just think we need to proceed with caution.

Blue Mosque
The morning of September 12, 2001, The manager at my job held a meeting with all of our Turkish employees. I worked on campus at my University, and the school had been recruiting students from Turkey for several years. Many of these students ended up working where I did, just for some extra cash. Our manager met with them to warn them about retaliation from fellow students, and the community after the 9/11 attacks. He also assured them of our support at work–we knew who they really were, and not to worry. The whole meeting worried me…I knew these guys…and obviously they were nowhere near the World Trade Center. I knew that they were in class that tragic morning–like the rest of us–or sleeping through class–like the rest of the rest of us. I wondered in the back of my mind if people really would equate MIDDLE EASTERN with MUSLIM and ultimately with TERRORIST.
I have grown up with friends from Saudi, Egyptian, Iranian, Turkish, Pakistani, and other backgrounds that made their family’s religious upbringing Muslim. As far as people go, they were only as different as my Jewish, Catholic or Korean Baptist friends were to me. Because of this, I absolutely REFUSE to believe that everyone in the Islamic world is our enemy. I want to see how far the propaganda of the Bush Administration and our emotional state (since 9/11 and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars) have taken us.
I found a poll–please take it! I want to see more of what we think about Islam (as I’m sure the author, Tony, does too) in a post-9/11 world. When I submitted my vote, the results I saw were quite surprising.


Ahmadinejad not in a position to lecture, but he made some good points.
September 24, 2009 in current events, The World | Tags: Afghanistan, Ahmadinejad, commentary, democracies, democracy, dictatorships, God, Imperialism, Iran, Iraq, Israel, mccarthyism, oppression, Pakistan, Palestine, political propaganda, regimes, Terrorism, totalitarian, UN, UN Speech, United Nations, United States, Zionism | Leave a comment
I had to take a day to collect myself after hearing Ahmadinejad’s UN speech. I actually had to lie down directly after hearing it. Don’t get me wrong–I DO NOT AGREE WITH EVERYTHING he says (and really disagree with what he does, for that matter), but I tried to listen to the speech with an open mind. I also try to listen often to the EIB with an open mind…although my teeth remain clenched more often than not. The Iranian leader’s speech was actually a nice break from that.
Yesterday, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made a scary amount of sense in what he had to say. Now, he does not have the mandate of God to sit in the ivory tower and shout down the truth at us, not with the magnitude of human rights atrocities that have and are still occurring in Iran. But…we majority nations–the U.S. (anihilation of many Native Americans, slavery, acutal use of atomic weapons, the Jim Crow/civil rights era, McCarthyism), Great Britain (imperialism on a GRAND scale, religious intolerance, oppression of the poor); add to this list the former Soviet Union, China, Germany, Israel–can not exactly claim purity, and can only speak from the perspective of repented sinners that have not been 100% rehabilitated. Not one of us may cast the first stone.
That being said, if it helps, remove the man himself from the statements and just listen to the speech. There are parts that could appeal to anyone and every nation. I can only pull from the experience of being an American, so this is what I heard.
The above statement would ring true with about 95% of our U.S. population, although we (myself included) would pick and choose what aspects of the statement we agree with.
When he spoke to Katie Couric, there was some ambiguity on whether Ahmadinejad now believes (or whatever) that the holocaust did occur. How one cannot believe that this happened is completely unfathomable, but he does state that the genocide and the consequence or outcome (creating Israel) do not logically make sense. It was, after all, a Nazi Germany that perpetuated the crimes, and our solution (although noble in intent) was to partition off a part of Palestine? In my lifetime, there has always been an Israel, and thus, there have always been strained relations with other nations in the middle east.
There has been unbelieveable cruelty from both Palestine and Israel towards each other. In the U.S. we tend to hear the Israeli side, and it is heartbreaking what they go through in an attempt to simply live their lives. But a clear picture requires the other side of the story as well. An interesting take on the Palestinian side is from the documentary “Death in Gaza,” which is well worth the time a viewing takes. After watching the documentary, genocide may not be the best descriptor, though.
Hmm….he goes on to say:
Before “Practice what you preach, brother,” is said, take into consideration the truth in those words. I cannot understand how this is the same man who pretty much authorized the torture and murder of election protestors and supressed the media (so the rest of the world wouldn’t find out about it? Really? In the age of Twitter???) during the same time frame. And while he also has a real problem with Israel, the recommendations he made to the UN to restructure are pretty logical too.
Still, I feel that we need to discuss with Iran why they want to enrich uranium, then, lend Iran the assistance of our best scientists, and help to keep the nuclear activities focused on electricity and medicine. Maybe forge a new partnership in creating something great that would benefit many nations? Someone on Huffington Post made a good point; if Iran gets and uses a nuclear weapon to harm anyone else in the world, they will cease to exist (some nation will make sure of it)–and nobody really wants that.
Had we and the British not interfered and had Mosaddeq overthrown, Ahmadinejad, his regime, and his views might not be before us today. Iran could have been our greatest ally in all of the events of the past half-century, and especially throughout the last decade. But here we are instead. *sigh*
(Oh, and by the way, a Republican administration made the original “overthrowing” happen.)